男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Chinese Perspectives

China right to pursue its modernization path

By Li Qingyun | China Daily | Updated: 2024-07-11 07:09
Share
Share - WeChat
SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

As the founding fathers of the United States declared, all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

In other words, the fundamental reasons a government is formed include providing the people of the country safety and security, fostering the country's economic development to produce benefits for all and facilitating social development to ensure a greater sense of happiness.

But how well have Western-style democracy and socialism with Chinese characteristics delivered these benefits to the people?

China launched reform and opening-up in 1978, but the growth of the Chinese economy in the past more than four decades has been beyond all expectations, perturbing the US-led West. China has lifted more people out of poverty than any other country in history in the shortest time. In just a matter of four-plus decades, about 800 million people in China have been lifted out of extreme poverty.

Modern China's economic development has vastly outpaced that of the US, with the growth of the Chinese economy being phenomenal. In fact, according to London-based World Economics estimates, China's economy is 33 percent bigger than the US' (in GDP purchasing power parity terms).

When one thinks about how big the US economy was compared to China's in 1978, the questions that arise are: Which economic system has produced more benefits for the common people? Which political system has been economically more successful?

Certain Western critics persist in characterizing the CPC's governance as "authoritarianism" instead of "democracy".

But in doing so, those critics forget that only 63 million people elected Donald Trump as US president in 2016. As a matter of fact, an analysis of voter data shows quite a sizable percentage of US citizens see the elections as a mandatory public exercise. For example, while the 2020 US presidential election saw the highest voter turnout since 1900, even with the aberrant boost, only about 37 percent of the US population voted that year and in the midterm elections in 2022. Does the US democracy truly represent the majority of US citizen's rights and opinions?

The other important question is: The "social fabric" developed by which political system is better, the US' or China's?

There may not be a single criterion to measure the social health or social cohesion of a country. But individual metrics do provide some insight into a country's social health. One criterion to measure a country's social health is what percentage of its population is in prison. While the US has about 1.8 million people in prison, China, with four times the US' population, has only 1.7 million people behind bars.

In terms of public safety and security, China has a much safer environment than the US no matter which metric you use to measure the situation. Not only is the rate of homicide but also that of other crimes in the US higher than in China.

Besides, the advent of the internet has created unprecedented opportunities for communication and dissemination of misinformation, and the US has done a most unsatisfactory job of addressing the social divisions stoked by deep fakes and false narratives.

Instead of curbing such crimes and offenses through centralized and effective control, the US has balkanized the problem by allowing private enterprises to provide internet content and services without strict management, including false and damaging content. Everyone agrees there have to be some laws or rules to regulate the internet. Why does the US perceive its more relaxed governance, which can foster environments conducive to violence and crime, as superior?

It is clear therefore that the Chinese political system has been far more successful than the US system in delivering government benefits to the average citizen.

The Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the CPC, to be held in Beijing from July 15 to 18 under the theme of further comprehensively deepening reform and promoting Chinese modernization, will likely encourage people to embark on a new journey of Chinese modernization, in order to improve people's well-being and promote social equity.

The author is a professor at the Institute of Chinese Marxism, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences. The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 黄冈市| 汾阳市| 孝感市| 阿坝县| 泰来县| 杭锦后旗| 长治市| 高邑县| 霍林郭勒市| 渭南市| 襄垣县| 洮南市| 益阳市| 荣成市| 临沭县| 喀喇沁旗| 房山区| 聂拉木县| 南雄市| 安吉县| 林芝县| 丘北县| 万载县| 梅河口市| 晴隆县| 闵行区| 咸宁市| 香港| SHOW| 玉环县| 新兴县| 富蕴县| 辽中县| 沂水县| 开封市| 萨迦县| 祥云县| 酉阳| 富蕴县| 思茅市| 板桥市| 柯坪县| 莎车县| 九龙城区| 大荔县| 龙川县| 宣恩县| 五常市| 尼玛县| 孙吴县| 伊宁县| 井冈山市| 铜山县| 巴东县| 晋中市| 绥江县| 本溪市| 资阳市| 驻马店市| 张家口市| 蒙阴县| 铜川市| 榆社县| 平果县| 海原县| 库伦旗| 禹城市| 石阡县| 海兴县| 延吉市| 京山县| 上思县| 平安县| 布尔津县| 富顺县| 寿宁县| 博乐市| 龙川县| 玛纳斯县| 鄄城县| 龙胜| 龙海市|