男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

No reason for Germany to let political expediency hurt relations with China: China Daily editorial

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2025-08-18 20:40
Share
Share - WeChat
Photo taken on July 21, 2019 from Xiangshan Mountain shows the Taipei 101 skyscraper in Taipei, Taiwan. [Photo/Xinhua]

In remarks that seem to contravene the one-China principle that Germany adheres to, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on Sunday criticized what he called the "aggressive behavior" of China in the Taiwan Strait.

Speaking to reporters ahead of a trip to Japan and Indonesia, Wadephul wantonly claimed that "China's increasingly aggressive behavior" in the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China seas "affects us in Europe", and warned that fundamental principles of "our global coexistence are at stake". He thus called for like-minded allies to counter this purported challenge.

For an official in such an important capacity as his to speak so mindlessly on a question that concerns China's core interests is at best a sign of pathetic ignorance, at worst evidence of an ill intent to enhance Germany's relations with other countries at the cost of the Sino-German relationship.

As a main trading partner of China, with close economic ties, Germany should assess the situation wisely, recognize the broader trends, and not blindly parrot Washington's words.

It is ill-perceived and even egregious to try to describe the necessary, legal and justified measures China has taken, or is compelled to take, to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity as "aggressive".

The top German diplomat is apparently blind to the fact that the secessionist-minded Democratic Progressive Party authorities on the island have in recent years intensified their efforts to incite confrontation across the Taiwan Strait and solicited the support of external forces in a bid to seek "independence" in a more provocative manner.

Also, some regional countries are relying on external forces to muddy the waters in the East and South China seas for their own narrow ends.

Demonstrably, China upholds a foreign policy of peaceful development, and is committed to resolving the territorial disputes with some of its neighbors through dialogue and consultation so as to maintain regional peace and stability. For Wadephul to try to hype up "China threat" in a bid to strengthen Germany's relations with other countries is both politically shortsighted and extremely irresponsible.

As Germany's foreign minister, Wadephul should know better than politicians from some other countries the significance of national reunification for a country, and he certainly knows that the one-China principle is the foundation for the stable and sound development of Sino-German relations.

Thus his ill-judged remarks aimed at exploiting China's internal affairs and its disputes with neighboring countries are a typical example of political expediency. They will unnecessarily have a negative impact on bilateral relations.

In an era marked by geopolitical tensions and economic cooperation, the partnership between China and Germany stands as a crucial pillar of global stability and prosperity.

Yet what Wadephul has said, if it reflects government policy, risks undermining this mutually beneficial relationship.

There is no denying that differences do exist between the two countries. However, there are no security conflicts between China and Germany. It is imperative that the two countries continue to pursue a stable and sound partnership by recognizing their shared interests and the broader significance of their cooperation.

Both nations have articulated a commitment to maintaining a robust partnership. Beijing has repeatedly emphasized the strategic and global significance of China-Germany and China-European Union relations, advocating a relationship based on mutual respect, shared interests and win-win cooperation. While German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has expressed his desire to deepen the Sino-German all-round strategic partnership and his willingness to enhance bilateral cooperation with China.

The differences between China and Germany should not overshadow the immense potential for cooperation. By focusing on mutual interests, expanding economic collaboration and maintaining open lines of communication, China and Germany can contribute to stability in an uncertain world. This partnership is not only in their own interests but also in the interest of a more balanced and harmonious global order.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 虹口区| 大连市| 浪卡子县| 武安市| 阿巴嘎旗| 紫阳县| 顺义区| 抚顺市| 齐河县| 龙游县| 雷山县| 阿拉尔市| 伊川县| 宁夏| 沙坪坝区| 靖江市| 吉隆县| 崇明县| 苍溪县| 武功县| 富阳市| 开封市| 永修县| 双鸭山市| 林口县| 任丘市| 灌阳县| 阿尔山市| 柞水县| 德惠市| 甘洛县| 保定市| 澄江县| 清苑县| 东阳市| 乡城县| 安顺市| 勐海县| 中方县| 潜江市| 吉水县| 宁河县| 十堰市| 通山县| 武城县| 库尔勒市| 芦溪县| 梅河口市| 桐庐县| 台安县| 太仆寺旗| 札达县| 嘉鱼县| 延川县| 三台县| 清流县| 依安县| 商河县| 武川县| 曲周县| 昭平县| 和田县| 崇阳县| 诏安县| 江北区| 伊通| 上杭县| 榆中县| 晋城| 仙居县| 当阳市| 连江县| 通山县| 崇仁县| 子长县| 旺苍县| 泾源县| 潮安县| 肥乡县| 平和县| 应城市| 涟源市|