男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
BIZCHINA> Top Biz News
Danone, Wahaha spar in US court
By Tuo Yannan (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-02-11 08:04

The litigation saga between French beverage maker Groupe Danone and Hangzhou-based Wahaha, controlled by flamboyant entrepreneur Zong Qinghou, has moved from the Chinese mainland into Europe and, now, the United States.

Related readings:
Danone, Wahaha spar in US court Wahaha, Danone start trademark arbitration
Danone, Wahaha spar in US court Danone to fight on after verdict
Danone, Wahaha spar in US court Danone wants full or partial exit from JV with Wahaha
Danone, Wahaha spar in US court Danone says contacts with Wahaha continuing

A superior court of the State of California in Los Angeles has begun hearing of the writ filed by Danone in June 2007 against Ever Maple Trading, the parent company of Wahaha.

In a statement, Danone alleged that Wahaha was "selling products which are the same as those sold by Wahaha Joint Ventures (partly owned by Danone) and is making use of the Joint Ventures' distributors and suppliers. Groupe Danone has filed the US complaint to put a stop to the defendants' collective scheme to interfere with its customer relationships and business prospects."

"This hearing is dealing with procedural issues, so does not address the merits of Danone's claims against the defendants," a spokesman of Danone told China Daily. A Wahaha spokesman declined to comment.

"The key issue is whether the cooperation agreement between Danone and Wahaha should be considered to be effective and enforceable," said Zhao Zhongcheng, a partner of the international trademark department of Unitalen law firm.

It appears the trademark assignment deed between the two is yet to be ratified by the Chinese Trademark Office. For that reason, "in accordance with the Chinese law and practice, the trademark assignment deed failed to take effect," said Zhao.

"I think Danone also has its own problem. It did not fully foresee the legal risk and trademark dispute existing in the cooperation agreement between the two parties. The assessment on the trademark issues and other legal issues in China appears to be insufficient," said Zhao.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industries)

 

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 平邑县| 湖口县| 霍城县| 甘孜| 东方市| 中西区| 疏附县| 西丰县| 通河县| 河西区| 林周县| 什邡市| 渑池县| 合肥市| 柳河县| 德庆县| 正镶白旗| 富锦市| 石屏县| 皮山县| 青冈县| 舞阳县| 夹江县| 林周县| 桃江县| 东莞市| 西青区| 昌宁县| 临沂市| 康保县| 双牌县| 交城县| 仁怀市| 黄山市| 闽清县| 渭南市| 伊金霍洛旗| 霍林郭勒市| 米易县| 梁平县| 平原县| 青岛市| 托克托县| 科尔| 封丘县| 靖宇县| 济南市| 定边县| 大新县| 清新县| 南安市| 嘉荫县| 固阳县| 河北省| 安西县| 江陵县| 三明市| 元氏县| 岳普湖县| 武冈市| 松溪县| 鲜城| 大庆市| 鄄城县| 长沙县| 武鸣县| 吉隆县| 昌宁县| 韶山市| 辽阳县| 武邑县| 庆城县| 枣阳市| 深圳市| 南京市| 彝良县| 得荣县| 廊坊市| 金平| 土默特右旗| 盐山县| 黄陵县|