|
BIZCHINA> Center
![]() |
|
China insists on principle of market economy on Huiyuan takeover
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2008-09-11 09:21 As Coca-Cola Co seeks to acquire China's largest juice company Huiyuan, a spokesman for the Ministry of Commerce said the government would insist on the principals of market-oriented economy under the legal process.
In an interview with Xinhua on the occasion of the 12th Xiamen International Fair for Investment and Trade in the southeast Fujian province, spokesman Yao Shenhong said the ministry "would review the case of Coca-Cola's acquisition of Huiyuan" and it was against monopoly while supporting "normal economic activities." "Once we receive the application we will start the antitrust review," Yao told Xinhua. Coca-Cola Co said on September 3 it had offered to buy Huiyuan for the equivalent of $2.4 billion in cash. If successful, it would be the second-largest acquisition in the company's history. The Atlanta, Georgia-based company said the offer needed to be approved by the Chinese government. The prospects of approval were unclear with much speculation emerging. In July, China turned down an offer by the Carlyle Group, a US-based private equity company, to acquire Xugong Group Construction Machinery Co. Both the Office of Anti-monopoly Investigations and Department of Treaty and Law in Ministry of Commerce, and Coca-Cola public affairs director Li Xiaoyun confirmed the company hadn't submitted the application as of Wednesday. Li said Coke was preparing the required materials and data for the application. "The review of anti-monopoly has nothing to do with suspicion of monopoly but were simply required when the related companies reached the criterion in the laws," said Li, who also goes by the name Brenda Lee. "This is a very normal process," she told Xinhua in a phone interview. "We simply submitted the materials according to the antitrust laws."
The examination should happen when the total trade volume of all the related companies exceeded 2 billion yuan in the last financial year and the trade volume of the two sides in China exceeded 400 million yuan. The law was welcomed by senior leaders of the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai. Coca-Cola was one of its members. "Frankly, we welcome the new anti-monopoly law as it brings transparency to acquisition cases in China. We welcome the transparency," said AmCham chairman Norwell Coquillard at the Xiamen Fair. "We understand the environment we invest in. We had estimated the market share of Huiyuan and Coca-Cola, which had reach the criterion, so we understand it has to be done," said Norwell, also the Cargill Investment (China) Ltd president. Since the antitrust law was a new law, Coca-Cola's case would test the regulations, he noted. His view was shared by Coca-Cola's Li. "Accurate laws clarify the investors concept of the procedures. It could also help to create a healthier investment environment and encourage more foreign investment." The case would also help China to detail the law for future protection of some important domestic markets, said Li Fei, a Xiamen University economics professor. The acquisition was considered to be a big step for the soft drink giant to explore its non-carbonated drinks market in China when the rate of carbonated drinks share had slowed. Last year, Coca-Cola launched its Minute Maid juice brand in China as part of its expansion into the nation's fruit and vegetable drinks business. The category was valued at $10.6 billion in 2007, while carbonated drinks were $7.4 billion, according to Euromonitor figures. (For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
|
主站蜘蛛池模板: 阳曲县| 天镇县| 安达市| 白城市| 万盛区| 英吉沙县| 磐石市| 阳原县| 二连浩特市| 柘荣县| 淮北市| 元氏县| 防城港市| 万荣县| 衡阳市| 麟游县| 汾西县| 兴海县| 松滋市| 彝良县| 鸡泽县| 沁源县| 绿春县| 吴川市| 义乌市| 喜德县| 奉化市| 德惠市| 定日县| 沙湾县| 兴山县| 夏邑县| 兴义市| 安西县| 梅州市| 武陟县| 二连浩特市| 黔西县| 沂源县| 宝应县| 类乌齐县| 大足县| 苏尼特右旗| 从化市| 桃园县| 玉树县| 赣州市| 咸丰县| 乃东县| 德格县| 安陆市| 东安县| 阜新市| 望奎县| 宁蒗| 巨野县| 白山市| 凤庆县| 柘荣县| 思南县| 平湖市| 海晏县| 霍邱县| 利津县| 白银市| 河津市| 余江县| 南城县| 裕民县| 大悟县| 盘山县| 昌都县| 博爱县| 边坝县| 南昌县| 辽源市| 河西区| 浙江省| 石门县| 龙口市| 广东省| 长治市|