男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

Apple and Proview court controversy at iPad hearing

Updated: 2012-02-23 10:20

By Wu Yiyao and Tang Yue (China Daily)

  Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small

 Apple and Proview court controversy at iPad hearing

Lawyer Ma Dongxiao, representing Shenzhen-based Proview Technology in a trademark dispute with Apple Inc, is surrounded by journalists outside a court in Shanghai on Wednesday. [Photo/China Daily]

 Apple and Proview court controversy at iPad hearing

Han Ziwen, a proud Apple customer, displays his newly purchased iPads outside the US tech firm's flagship store in Beijing on Sept 17, 2010. Like many others, Han had lined up outside the store for 60 hours to be one of the first to buy an iPad in China. However, the product could be pulled from the shelves if Apple loses its trademark dispute with Shenzhen Proview Technology. [Photo/AFP]

Apple and Proview court controversy at iPad hearing

Heated exchanges in trademark dispute, report Wu Yiyao in Shanghai and Tang Yue in Beijing.

Attorneys for Shenzhen Proview Technology and Apple went head-to-head on Wednesday during a heated hearing in Shanghai over the bitter iPad trademark dispute.

The first session was adjourned after four hours, during which Proview denied having sold the right to use the iPad trademark to Apple, while the US tech giant rejected calls for a sales ban on its tablet computers.

Lawyers for the plaintiff and defendant were repeatedly admonished by the presiding judge and told to respect court protocol during arguments. No date was set for a verdict or second hearing.

At the heart of the dispute is the sale of the trademark by Proview's Taiwan affiliate to an Apple subsidiary in 2009.

Xie Xianghui, representing the Shenzhen LCD maker, argued that the transfer was invalid, as it was incomplete. In evidence, Proview presented its IPAD - Internet Personal Access Device - to show it was the first to register the trademark and produce a product.

Apple's use of the iPad name has also made it hard for the Chinese company to sell the trademark, such as to Chinese phone makers and PC maker, Xie said, adding that this means Proview may be unable to repay its bank debts.

However, Hu Jinnan, Apple's attorney, countered that Proview has not marketed or sold its IPAD for years, thus potentially invalidating its claim to the trademark.

The US tech firm also presented copies of e-mails as evidence that Proview was aware of the trademark sale and that the parent company was involved during the process.

A sales ban of the iPad in China will affect a large group, including consumers, added Hu.

Xie dismissed the argument and added that a block on the use of the trademark was unlikely to hurt Apple's profit margins.

Just 50 people were admitted into the gallery to watch the proceedings, which have attracted worldwide attention and thrown a spotlight on trademark disputes in China.

Shu Jianxin, an intellectual property attorney in Shanghai who has been following the case closely, said that if Proview is successful, Apple's tablet computers could be pulled from shelves within 48 hours.

   Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page  

主站蜘蛛池模板: 南涧| 淳安县| 塔河县| 余干县| 民丰县| 安阳县| 河南省| 靖宇县| 石棉县| 阜平县| 绥宁县| 新津县| 奉贤区| 多伦县| 上林县| 永丰县| 进贤县| 边坝县| 甘泉县| 长海县| 开原市| 综艺| 时尚| 项城市| 乌海市| 湘西| 泰顺县| 聊城市| 资阳市| 灵武市| 辛集市| 安平县| 洞口县| 乾安县| 平舆县| 大悟县| 卓资县| 龙胜| 平原县| 高雄市| 万盛区| 平塘县| 江安县| 寿光市| 桑日县| 临夏市| 高雄县| 古交市| 云南省| 新邵县| 普宁市| 开江县| 西平县| 新余市| 阳曲县| 韶关市| 巴彦淖尔市| 乌兰浩特市| 呼和浩特市| 麦盖提县| 淮南市| 通海县| 社会| 临城县| 临漳县| 浮山县| 镶黄旗| 滁州市| 永清县| 泗阳县| 河曲县| 武安市| 错那县| 金溪县| 登封市| 内丘县| 安阳县| 甘德县| 库车县| 绩溪县| 邻水| 上饶县|