男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

Court set to hear appeal of iPad trademark ruling

Updated: 2012-02-29 08:01

By Zhang Zhao (China Daily)

  Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Court set to hear appeal of iPad trademark ruling

A visitor experiences an iPad at an electronics shop in Tianjin. Part of Proview's strategy has been to request a ban on sales. [Photo / China Daily]

One seal missing

The final round in court will also hear legalities about Apple's original effort to acquire the name.

Using a UK shell company, Apple bought the iPad trademark from Taiwan Proview Electronics in 2009.

According to Wang Tianle, general manager of the Henan trademark law firm Windbrand, Apple "might have thought the deal included the Chinese mainland" as the corporate representative of both Shenzhen and Taiwan Proview was the same person - Rowell Yang, also known as Yang Long-san.

But Apple failed to notice the difference in regulations between Taiwan and the mainland, Wang said.

"In Taiwan, the signature of the company's chairman on the contract will be OK, but according to laws on the Chinese mainland, the company's seal counts," he explained.

The contract for the iPad trademark transfer does not include the seal of Proview Technology.

"If Apple and Yang both understood that the contract included Shenzhen Proview and affixed a seal (of the Shenzhen company), then there would not be a dispute now," he said.

More than a trademark

Industry insiders say the impact of the case goes beyond a trademark.

"It is hard to say which side is cheating the other," Wang said. "It has now come to a stage that is not just as simple as a trademark dispute, but rather like fighting for bigger benefits.

"One trademark can revive a company, and can ruin it, too," he said. "Foreign companies have been using intellectual property as a weapon on Chinese counterparts and the iPad event may become a great victory for a Chinese company in the IP battlefield.

"But in the end, they must calm down and compete in a rational way," he added.

"Compared with developed countries, China has limited competence in protecting intellectual property rights," said attorney Qu. "Today, competition among big companies is about intellectual property."

"Apple products have very simple names that are easy to register as trademarks by others," said You. "If Apple insists it will not change the names, it has to face the problem of purchasing trademarks on a global scale."

Facebook, another global IT giant, has filed dozens of trademark applications in China since 2006, although it has yet to enter the market.

 
 

   Previous Page 1 2 Next Page  

主站蜘蛛池模板: 上虞市| 乐平市| 潞西市| 青河县| 华阴市| 利津县| 色达县| 吉首市| 札达县| 交口县| 饶平县| 黔东| 合水县| 湟中县| 新龙县| 太白县| 澄迈县| 正阳县| 淄博市| 大连市| 深水埗区| 遂宁市| 封丘县| 寻甸| 临江市| 卫辉市| 遂溪县| 祁东县| 滦平县| 扬中市| 大安市| 临西县| 丽水市| 德惠市| 锡林郭勒盟| 凤凰县| 休宁县| 壶关县| 平果县| 凌海市| 梁河县| 桐庐县| 拉萨市| 凤台县| 德阳市| 修水县| 锦屏县| 霍州市| 崇明县| 贵阳市| 迁西县| 大宁县| 庆安县| 汨罗市| 荔浦县| 绥阳县| 城口县| 宿迁市| 壶关县| 周至县| 钟山县| 台山市| 宁城县| 石渠县| 睢宁县| 新沂市| 枣阳市| 黄浦区| 普格县| 临朐县| 桑日县| 来安县| 揭阳市| 绥德县| 新绛县| 扬州市| 莆田市| 莱西市| 沾化县| 永胜县| 彭山县| 化隆|