男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   

Judge guarantees fair play in all IPR cases

By Xie Chuanjiao (China Daily)
Updated: 2008-02-20 06:57

JINAN: Chinese courts adhere to national treatment principles and abide by international conventions to protect the rights of foreign holders of intellectual property rights, a senior judge told a national conference on IPR-related trials Tuesday.

"In IPR cases involving foreign parties, we insist on fair trials and equal protection for all involved, ensure trials' independence and neutrality, and maintain a sound judicial image," Cao Jianming, vice-president of the Supreme People's Court (SPC), said.

He called on courts to be balanced in their approach to the interests of domestic and foreign parties.

Related readings:
 China to issue IPR strategy in 2008
 China taking 'right steps' to protect IPR
 Company sues Microsoft for IPR abuse
 Chinese firms lectured on patent protection against US IPR investigations

 Guangdong to give IPR shot in the arm

"Courts should neither exaggerate national interests, nor fail to achieve just trials and equal protection because of pressure from foreign parties," Cao said.

Courts should handle all cases strictly according to the law, regardless of whether they are straightforward ones involving foreign parties, or highly sensitive ones that could attract global attention, he said.

"Courts must not sacrifice justice to blindly cater to unilateral foreign public opinions."

China's IPR laws are mostly in line with international legislation, but when they are not, we will give priority to international conventions that are directly applicable to domestic trials, Cao said.

"IPR protection has become a constant strategic topic in China's external affairs," he said.

"On the one hand, China has made remarkable progress, while on the other, some developed countries keep applying pressure as global IPR competition intensifies.

"It is impossible to solve in a short time contradictions between China's economic and technical shortcomings as a developing country and the high IPR protection standards proposed by developed countries," Cao said.

"The disputes will last for a long time."

The number of IPR cases involving foreign parties has risen significantly over the past seven years, according to Jiang Zhipei, chief justice of the SPC IPR Tribunal.

Between 2001 and last year, Chinese courts concluded more than 1,600 IPR cases involving overseas parties. Last year alone, they handled 668 cases, up 89 percent on 2006, 164 of which were dealt with by courts in Shanghai.

Ying Xinlong, vice-president of the Shanghai High People's Court, said that as well as the number of cases rising, their value is also going up.

Last year, China Cyber Port, an online game provider based in Wuhan, capital of Hubei province, filed a 100-million-yuan ($14 million) suit with the Shanghai No 1 Intermediate People's Court against Shanghai Holdfast Online Information Technology Co Ltd over copyright infringement.

The case was eventually dismissed in June for insufficient evidence.



Top China News  
Today's Top News  
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
主站蜘蛛池模板: 尼勒克县| 乳源| 陆河县| 富川| 鸡泽县| 怀化市| 凤翔县| 宜兰县| 中山市| 铁力市| 南通市| 正阳县| 娄底市| 蒙自县| 区。| 乐昌市| 津市市| 青浦区| 普陀区| 绍兴市| 墨竹工卡县| 武胜县| 新泰市| 怀来县| 临夏市| 长岛县| 湖北省| 甘肃省| 云林县| 尼勒克县| 赣州市| 侯马市| 左贡县| 陆丰市| 桦川县| 巩留县| 尖扎县| 定西市| 石门县| 洪雅县| 日照市| 浦城县| 开江县| 太谷县| 仪征市| 高青县| 宜城市| 崇仁县| 固镇县| 长兴县| 高阳县| 丰宁| 大丰市| 揭东县| 罗田县| 北安市| 耒阳市| 泰顺县| 祥云县| 武汉市| 潜江市| 镇坪县| 盐源县| 汕头市| 黑水县| 紫金县| 太仓市| 密云县| 新闻| 青神县| 陆河县| 揭西县| 西乡县| 张掖市| 河南省| 龙山县| 镇坪县| 黔东| 仁怀市| 临西县| 兴山县| 濮阳县|