男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Population policy change needs more moves

By Stuart Basten (China Daily) Updated: 2015-01-14 08:33

In 2012, the State Council-funded China Development Research Foundation advocated a three-step reform process: an immediate geographically selective two-child policy, a national two-child policy by 2015, and the removal of all constraints by 2020. At the moment, the reform timetable still seems achievable. But will such changes have much effect?

Evidence seems to suggest that the family planning policy alone is no longer responsible for the dropping fertility rate; other social and economic factors are playing a major role. For a start, we need to see children as social goods and not just as future producers and consumers. In this way, we can try to develop a society which is more broadly supportive of parents and children both. This will require thinking about not just family policies as such, but much broadly about, for example, funding for education, planning and housing policy, the burden of care for older people placed upon couples and so on.

A final thought is that we need to move the conversation on from a fear of a "demographic time bomb" of low fertility, declining population and so-called rapid aging. China's population - both younger and older people - is healthier and better educated than ever. The Chinese economy is more efficient and technologically advanced than ever. And urbanization and the technological revolution have made China an ever more connected and integrated economy.

In this context, the raw numbers of people are arguably less important than the sum of their skills, their health, their education, their work and their families. Instead of being frightened about demographic change, we just need to set about making a better society for all through comprehensive, integrated social reform. Having said that, better support for the (rural) elderly people and ensuring inclusive economic development and innovation must be seen as immediate priorities.

The author is an associate professor in Social Policy, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 南江县| 天津市| 观塘区| 梅河口市| 上栗县| 罗田县| 芷江| 临漳县| 孝感市| 贡嘎县| 崇义县| 曲水县| 肇东市| 鄢陵县| 和田县| 历史| 平顺县| 新民市| 海城市| 金门县| 乌拉特后旗| 湖北省| 长沙市| 九龙县| 河西区| 即墨市| 黔南| 郑州市| 靖远县| 临朐县| 天台县| 清丰县| 丰县| 静宁县| 博罗县| 丰原市| 萍乡市| 紫阳县| 海原县| 金湖县| 永胜县| 佛教| 鹿泉市| 广宁县| 遂宁市| 岫岩| 临潭县| 大同县| 三都| 佛山市| 剑阁县| 宁津县| 仙游县| 永仁县| 光山县| 夏邑县| 定远县| 贵溪市| 墨江| 建宁县| 江北区| 渭南市| 桐庐县| 宣恩县| 庄河市| 高邑县| 阜新市| 中超| 荃湾区| 沅江市| 株洲市| 鄂托克旗| 富蕴县| 安丘市| 疏附县| 汾西县| 恩施市| 弥勒县| 静宁县| 墨脱县| 太原市| 徐汇区|