男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Time to break free of protectionist shackles

By Mei Xinyu (China Daily) Updated: 2016-05-25 07:45

Time to break free of protectionist shackles

An employee welds the exterior of a vehicle along a production line at a factory in Qingdao, Shandong province. [Photo/Agencies]

The overwhelming-majority vote in the European Parliament recently against granting China market economy status was not made on a reasonable basis and doing so will not bring benefits to the European Union.

Whether or not to give China the market economy status treatment is not an issue concerning whether China has met market economic standards unilaterally set by the EU, but an issue concerning whether the EU honors its commitment or not.

According to the accession articles China signed on entry to the World Trade Organization 15 years ago, China should be automatically granted market economy status in December this year. Such an article is unconditional and means that WTO members should abandon the surrogate country approach used in the past for anti-dumping investigations against China. Any investigation should instead be based on product prices or production costs in China itself.

Aside from the long-term negative effects produced by the protectionist effort to avoid industrial competition, the European Parliament's refusal to grant China market economy treatment will not have favorable short-term effects on the bloc's industrial development. In a passed resolution, the European Parliament pointed out that 56 of the anti-dumping measures the EU is taking are targeted at imports from China, covering both traditional labor-intensive manufacturing and such capital and technology-intensive manufacturing as steel products. It is exactly such an announcement that has made protectionists in the EU lobby for not granting China market economy status so that they can say "no" to "made in China" brands as a means of job protection.

Some in the EU should know that while exporting products to the rest of the world, China is also the world's leading market for imports and its growth in imports is among the fastest of world's major economies either in trade in goods or in trade in services. China's import volume denominated in the US dollar suffered a 14.1 percent decline year-on-year in 2015, bigger than the 13.4 percent decline in the import volume of the EU, but this was mainly a result of the drastic drop in prices of the primary commodities China heavily imports. China's imports of manufactured goods from the United States and European countries still enjoy huge potential for growth.

Following the European Parliament's recommendation will do no good to the struggling EU economy, given that encouraging trade protectionism will do nothing but worsen the EU's industrial environment. There were some countries in the past that did succeed in realizing the development of some infant industries through protectionist industrial policies. However, what the European Parliament's resolution tried to protect is not high-tech pioneering sectors, but such traditional sectors as steel that have already experienced their golden period and now enjoy no development potential. Interest groups dominating these out-of-date and weakly-founded industries do not focus their attention on how to raise their efficiency, but instead think how to maintain previous protectionist measures to lengthen their survival. Such attempts offer no hope for the future of EU industry and on the contrary add to its cost burden. What the EU should do is to inject new vitality into its economy.

The protectionism of interest groups has shackled the EU's economic vitality. It is exactly trade protectionism that has put the eurozone economy at a disadvantageous position in its competition with other developed economies, and caused the continuous decline of its economic proportion in the world's total GDP. Of the EU members, the countries advocating liberal trade such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Belgium, support granting China market economy status and they have also achieved a better economic performance than the eurozone as a whole. France, Italy and Spain who are opposed to granting China market economy status, however, have performed worse than the eurozone's average performance

Europe should know that the development and buildup of interest groups, a byproduct of a country or region's economic prosperity, will suffocate the vigor of its innovation and continuous growth, and only by smashing the shackles imposed by these groups can it achieve sustainable development.

The author is a researcher at the Ministry of Commerce's International Trade and Economic Cooperation Institute.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 清徐县| 宿州市| 安康市| 青神县| 呼伦贝尔市| 江北区| 长泰县| 芷江| 玉田县| 林甸县| 济阳县| 微博| 东乡县| 九龙城区| 德清县| 那坡县| 昌吉市| 迭部县| 浪卡子县| 淳安县| 天镇县| 琼海市| 大竹县| 德庆县| 江油市| 辰溪县| 常州市| 永州市| 肥乡县| 金溪县| 渑池县| 河北区| 云浮市| 柏乡县| 仙居县| 延寿县| 旅游| 邯郸县| 洛浦县| 独山县| 台南县| 静安区| 宜州市| 庆安县| 永福县| 新和县| 定州市| 阳原县| 疏勒县| 汨罗市| 新泰市| 封丘县| 黄山市| 大竹县| 桦川县| 礼泉县| 常山县| 荆州市| 沙河市| 平凉市| 十堰市| 枣庄市| 修武县| 思南县| 绥江县| 壶关县| 达尔| 富民县| 英山县| 随州市| 饶阳县| 米脂县| 五台县| 菏泽市| 四川省| 东宁县| 德保县| 喀什市| 隆化县| 安多县| 竹山县| 林口县|