男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Wang Hui

Australian bias against Chinese investment

By Wang Hui (China Daily) Updated: 2015-12-02 08:27

Australian bias against Chinese investment

Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) shakes hands with Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott during their meeting in Canberra, capital of Australia, Nov. 17, 2014. [Photo/Xinhua]

Changes in Australia's foreign investment regime have drawn concerns in both China and Australia.

Australia's parliament passed new rules on foreign investment on Nov 24, which lowered the benchmark for Chinese investment into agriculture from 252 million Australian dollars ($184 million) to 15 million Australian dollars.

Australian bias against Chinese investment

In other words, all Australia-bound Chinese investments in the agricultural sector which exceed 15 million Australian dollars are now subject to review and approval from Australia's Foreign Investment Review Board.

In stark contrast, the threshold for the United States (Australia's largest direct foreign investor), New Zealand and Chile will remain one billion Australian dollars, while Singapore and Thailand's threshold remains 50 million Australian dollars.

It is clear China is to be most closely scrutinized among Australia's foreign trade partners.

Such an arrangement is unfair to Chinese investors who deserve a level playing field to compete as equals with Australia's foreign trade partners. From no won, any talk that Australia welcomes Chinese investment will sound hypocritical.

Whether for its own economic interests or the smooth implementation of the free trade agreement it has signed with Beijing, Canberra should have done more to facilitate Chinese investment rather than setting obstacles in its way.

It will be interesting to see what those who have been preaching free trade and criticizing China for its domestic competition environment have to say about Australia's retrogression in the spirit of free trade.

Since the birth of the new regulation, some Australian politicians and experts have tried to clarify that the new rules do not target China. But it seems they cannot even convince their own countrymen.

In an article published on the website of Australian newspaper The Financial Review, James Laurenceso, deputy director of Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney, said Chinese investment has already been scrutinized far more closely than investment from any other country.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
Being unaware of hypocrisy is itself hypocrisy
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 湘潭市| 邹平县| 巫山县| 浏阳市| 香格里拉县| 界首市| 高密市| 楚雄市| 九台市| 栾川县| 通州市| 准格尔旗| 瓮安县| 夏津县| 华容县| 宜都市| 山阴县| 婺源县| 普兰县| 淄博市| 阿克陶县| 大渡口区| 潼南县| 临夏市| 通河县| 三明市| 公安县| 扎囊县| 茌平县| 聊城市| 宁安市| 灵寿县| 楚雄市| 鲁山县| 威宁| 焦作市| 景洪市| 永平县| 清河县| 赞皇县| 齐齐哈尔市| 周至县| 共和县| 博客| 敦煌市| 定襄县| 武胜县| 即墨市| 城步| 平塘县| 东乡| 顺平县| 独山县| 绥滨县| 贵德县| 晋中市| 安徽省| 大丰市| 宁都县| 宁德市| 西丰县| 怀仁县| 安达市| 礼泉县| 资溪县| 英超| 舞钢市| 武夷山市| 汉沽区| 太湖县| 武清区| 磐安县| 大埔区| 延吉市| 鄱阳县| 凤山县| 辽中县| 方正县| 伊宁市| 内黄县| 洞口县| 台东县|