Making the info highway a two-way street

Every civilization likes to think itself the center of the world. Nationalistic narcissism knows no boundaries, and that's where there are bubbles of delusion waiting to be popped.

By tradition, Chinese media coverage of foreign leaders and foreign political tensions is rather muted, partly in the spirit of live and let live, and partly as a diplomatic courtesy. But the world is wired now, and it's noisier, and there is little reticence in criticizing China.

By and large it's best to take the clamor and noise in stride, because actions speak louder than words.

But this would also be a good time to make the information highway truly a two-way street. Let China look at the world and tell us what it sees, diplomatic niceties aside.

There's no contesting the fact that the US, as the world's reigning superpower, has serious problems that need serious attention. Sharp incisive articles and analysis from Chinese scholars and commentators can and should be part of a constructive dialogue.

What's happening to the US, until recently a role model for so many? What's with the incidents of racism? What's with the rampant gun violence? What's with the reckless drone-bombing of alleged militants abroad? If someone out there is offering constructive criticism on how a nation in distress can heal itself, is there anything to be gained by turning a deaf ear to helpful suggestions?

China Daily and Global Times have exhibited a knack for producing eye-catching and quote-worthy stories in English. But to win a global audience is a tall order, and they need to be more innovative, flexible and diversified to hold their own and help set the agenda in the global conversation.

The author is a media researcher covering Asian politics.