男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Lens

ROK ought to boost trilateral coordination

By Hwang Jae-ho | China Daily | Updated: 2025-06-03 07:50
Share
Share - WeChat
A person casts their vote at a polling station during the presidential election in Seoul, South Korea, Jun 3, 2025. [Photo/Agencies]

The Republic of Korea is scheduled to elect a new president on June 3. Although both leading presidential candidates — the liberal Democratic Party of Korea candidate Lee Jae-myung and the conservative People Power Party's candidate Kim Moon-soo — will likely prioritize the US-ROK alliance after the winning the election, and the difference would be in how they deal with Japan and China respectively.

The Democratic Party may not be blindly pro-China and anti-Japan. Instead, its policy toward China and Japan may be somewhere between the policies of the liberal Moon Jae-in administration and the conservative Yoon Suk-yeol administration. However, the conservatives, despite remaining pro-Japan, would adjust the ROK's relations with China as needed. Even during the Yoon administration, there were no fundamental changes in China-ROK ties. Yet at the tactical level, bilateral relations improved, albeit through the China-Japan-ROK trilateral relationship.

In the context of deepening trilateral cooperation, the new ROK government's efforts to withdraw from trilateral cooperation would give the US leverage and Japan the opportunity to blame the ROK for souring relations. Hence, it would be more beneficial for Seoul to apply the US-ROK-Japan mini-lateral format of diplomacy to the ROK-China-Japan relationship in order to have more diplomatic options at its disposal.

In short, the mini-lateral framework would be useful for Seoul's diplomacy, as it would help mitigate the risk of US-China competition in Northeast Asia, and manage ROK-Japan and ROK-China relations under the trilateral cooperation framework.

If bilateral relations are burdensome, a trilateral framework can lessen sensitivity. This is also true for China and Japan, and is in the interest of all three countries.

The core of trilateral cooperation has remained economic cooperation, but the three sides have not been able to realize its full potential due to the lack of institutionalization. The core of trilateral cooperation is the trilateral free trade agreement, negotiations on which are yet to be held on a full scale. Due to this lack of institutionalization, China and the ROK have a low-level FTA, while the ROK and Japan, and China and Japan have none.

Additionally, geopolitical risks are very high, with the United States pressuring the ROK and Japan for "decoupling" or "de-risking" from China, and its protectionist measures are threatening trilateral cooperation.

Nevertheless, China-ROK-Japan relations still hold promise. To translate that promise into concrete results, the three sides need to institutionalize economic and trade cooperation, accelerate free trade agreement negotiations, and build resilient supply chains. Based on their respective national interests, the three sides should promote sustainable economic growth, while deepening cooperation in the high-tech sector and facilitating cooperation among their enterprises.

The three sides also have to promote the industrial division of labor based on their respective strength in advanced technologies, and address common challenges such as declining birthrates, aging populations and demographic changes. They need to increase people-to-people exchanges, including student exchanges, too, while reducing people's negative perceptions of each other.

Furthermore, the three countries need to boost mutual political trust and increase strategic communication, while jointly devising cooperation models that go beyond zero-sum games and contribute to the public good.

They also need to adhere to the philosophy of "addition", not subtraction, and promote the "three-in-one" spirit. Trilateral cooperation is, after all, an investment in the constructive future of Northeast Asia. And we hope the three countries will steer the future in a positive direction.

The author is a professor of International Studies at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 明星| 汉中市| 共和县| 凌云县| 安仁县| 广平县| 东阿县| 泸西县| 河曲县| 新疆| 新河县| 镇平县| 新余市| 鄂州市| 黎平县| 大埔区| 会昌县| 岑巩县| 宜兰县| 米林县| 霸州市| 图片| 泰宁县| 胶州市| 定结县| 东宁县| 华池县| 东山县| 泗洪县| 来凤县| 达拉特旗| 彭山县| 社会| 阳泉市| 榆树市| 司法| 襄垣县| 都江堰市| 盖州市| 玉林市| 潢川县| 安陆市| 双城市| 鄂尔多斯市| 高淳县| 博白县| 古浪县| 内乡县| 莲花县| 平果县| 伽师县| 阳信县| 辽宁省| 张家港市| 饶河县| 安康市| 九龙县| 方正县| 德惠市| 错那县| 启东市| 延庆县| 浏阳市| 临汾市| 固阳县| 樟树市| 郓城县| 遵义市| 丁青县| 会同县| 阜城县| 桐梓县| 德格县| 新乐市| 青州市| 中牟县| 塔城市| 旌德县| 松溪县| 腾冲县| 洪湖市| 临海市|