男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Social protection is key to tackle Asia-Pacific’s inequality trap

By Shamshad Akhtar (chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2016-03-23 17:21

Social protection is key to tackle Asia-Pacific’s inequality trap

Migrant workers look up at skyscrapers in Shanghai on Nov 3, 2013. The disposable income of residents in China is on the increase. [Photo/IC]

Rising inequality threatens to derail, from the start, successful implementation of the new 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in the Asia-Pacific region. Stronger, more equitable social protection will be critical in overcoming these challenges.

New research by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) indicates that inequality, related to both outcomes and opportunities, is on the rise in the countries of Asia and the Pacific – and where it has not risen it has remained unacceptably high. This is having an adverse impact on sustainable development.

Growing disparities in income and wealth, as well as unequal opportunities, reinforce each other, creating an "inequality trap" that disproportionately affects women and the most vulnerable members of society, including the poor, youth, persons with disabilities, migrants and older persons.

This stands in sharp contrast to both the shared growth that defined the rise of the 'Asian Tigers' in the 1960s, and more recent trends in other parts of the developing world, in particular Latin America, where income inequality has been decreasing over the recent decades.

Over the past 20 years, the rich in Asia and the Pacific have grown richer, at the expense of the poor. Inequalities in regional opportunities also abound, with nearly 80 per cent of the population lacking access to affordable health care, and as many as 18 million children out of school. Access to these basic social services are considerably lower among low-income groups and rural communities.

In the context of the 2030 Agenda, inequality casts deep shadows on all three pillars of sustainability – economic, social and environmental.

Economically, inequality threatens regional dynamism, is destructive to the sustainability of growth, and makes it more difficult to reduce poverty through growth. Had Asia-Pacific inequality not increased, an additional almost 200 million people would have been lifted out of poverty in the three largest countries in the region over the last two decades.

Inequality undermines social cohesion and solidarity. A growing divide between the rich and the poor is often a factor in rising levels of crime and social unrest, undermining trust and weakening bonds of solidarity. In extreme cases, especially where inequality manifests along ethnic lines, it can lead to polarization, radicalization and even failure of the State.

Environmental sustainability is also hampered by inequalities, which create resentments and disincentives and, in turn, generate pervasive free-riding and overuse of resources, with unsustainable environmental outcomes. For instance, evidence from India and Nepal suggests that inequalities in local rural communities actually intensify deforestation.

This is why tackling inequality must be central to the sustainable development agenda. Perfect equality of wealth and income is not attainable but, when it comes to inequalities of opportunity, such as access to health and education, Asia-Pacific governments should not settle for less than a perfectly "level playing field."

It is encouraging to see that, in addition to traditional cash transfers, Asia-Pacific countries are introducing innovative measures to reduce inequalities, such as health equity funds, impact investing in education, universal health coverage and expanding access to old-age pensions.

Building on this momentum, countries could also develop sets of complementary policies to tackle inequality in all its forms:

First, national taxation systems could be strengthened. There is ample room to expanding the tax base and strengthen compliance frameworks across the region. This is an effective way of broadening fiscal space to finance redistributive mechanisms, while building solidarity across socioeconomic groups and generations.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 新巴尔虎左旗| 绥中县| 敦化市| 雅江县| 民丰县| 景泰县| 张家川| 甘谷县| 永福县| 杂多县| 曲沃县| 舞钢市| 玛纳斯县| 崇明县| 孝义市| 葫芦岛市| 金寨县| 阜宁县| 敦化市| 余庆县| 南召县| 博爱县| 闽侯县| 嘉定区| 渝中区| 沂南县| 连江县| 黑水县| 如东县| 河曲县| 台北县| 古田县| 株洲县| 繁昌县| 阜新市| 和平区| 扬州市| 玛纳斯县| 珠海市| 德庆县| 文安县| 建始县| 凤山市| 宁蒗| 舞阳县| 望谟县| 澄迈县| 涪陵区| 岳阳县| 南充市| 开平市| 商河县| 松江区| 东城区| 米脂县| 会昌县| 绥德县| 淅川县| 丰城市| 明光市| 平远县| 宁蒗| 旅游| 永吉县| 南丰县| 黔西县| 库尔勒市| 会同县| 常山县| 大庆市| 岗巴县| 巢湖市| 朝阳区| 湘潭县| 崇州市| 景谷| 泸西县| 武宁县| 铜山县| 广西| 蓬溪县| 海盐县|